One of my favorite people whom I met in recent years is a sweet, wickedly clever and funny rabbi by the name of Michael Paley. In certain circles of liberal Judaism he is very well known, both in the USA and beyond. And it so happens that we frequent the same synagogue on Shabbat mornings.

Last Shabbat it was Paley’s 65th birthday, and he was given the honor of delivering the dvar torah, the commentary on the weekly portion. The talk was beautiful, moving, at times funny; but one story he told was astounding.

During the lowest point of Bill Clinton’s presidency, when the impeachment proceedings were going on, he invited a number of clergy to meet with him in Cincinnati. Paley was one of the invitees. So he told himself: “If I’m going to meet with the President, it’s not just going to be a feel-good photo-op; I’m going to deliver a message!” So he prepared himself thoroughly for that moment.

Clinton was going around and shaking hands with each of the individuals present. When it was Paley’s turn, he said to him what he prepared himself to say: “Mr. President, you have to do t’shuvah! This is the time for t’shuvah!”

[For those who don’t know, t’shuvah is a fundamental Jewish concept that is often translated as “repentance”, although, like the Greek metanoia which is also translated that way, it means much more: it means a return—a return to purity or a return to one’s own nature. Repentance is one aspect of it.]
Clinton response to Paley was surprising: “When you say t’shuvah,” he responded, “do you mean it the way Rabbi Soloveitchik was teaching it, or do you mean it the way Rabbi Kook was teaching it?”

That was certainly not what Paley was expecting. For Clinton to even know the names of these two gigantic figures of 20th century Judaism (both were dead by that time) was surprising enough; that he also knew the subtle differences between how they understood t’shuva is another matter altogether. Clinton, at that point, demonstrated that he knew more about Judaism than most modern day Jews!

* * *

Before continuing with the story, let me say a word about the different approaches, to the extent that I understand it. Rabbi Soloveitchik belonged to a highly regarded dynasty of Lithuanian Jewish scholars. Their form of Judaism was based upon deep learning, the performance of the commandments, and purifying your middot, your moral attributes. Rabbi Kook, while also great in learning and orthodox in his observance of the commandments (he was the first Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel), was also a mystic, and served as a Chassidic Rebbe (spiritual teacher) for a number of communities throughout Europe before World War 2.

For Soloveitchik, the essence of t’shuvah was that when you are tempted to repeat a transgression that you were in the habit of performing, you master your strength and resist that temptation. t’shuvah for his school of thought meant the constant effort to bettering oneself. For Kook, your essence was already pure, already free of blemishes, since it is a spark of the divine. For Kook, therefore, t’shuvah meant returning to your essential nature, to who you already are—pure, unblemished, a spark of the divine.

* * *

Surprising as it was to hear the President of the United States ask such a fine theological question, Paley, being Paley, did not miss a beat and said: “Rav Kook’s version of t’shuvah, of course!”
“That’s interesting”, answered Clinton. “Most people I spoke to recommended the Soloveitchik approach. Let’s talk.” And when the meeting was over, Paley got to sit with Clinton for a private meeting for 15 minutes explaining to him why, in his eyes, Kook’s approach was more to his liking.

* * *

This is a perfect story for our times. We are approaching Rosh Hashanah, the time of year devoted to t’shuvah. And the question is, which meaning of t’shuvah do we want to embrace in our lives? Is t’shuvah a Sisyphean, uphill battle with one’s evil inclinations? Or is it a return to one’s divine nature? As a meditator and a mystic, I’m inspired by the latter.

I am writing this as a way of wishing everyone a Happy New Year, Shanah Tovah, and that we would all return to finding our true nature: through prayer, through meditation, through creative endeavors—whatever works. Our world desperately needs more of us to engage in this pursuit.

Corrections: a previous version of this blog stated that the meeting occurred at the White House (it tool place in Cincinnati). It also stated that Rabbi Soloveitchik was still alive at that time; he passed away a few years earlier.

Photo of Rabbi Paley with President Clinton and letter from President Clinton to Rabbi. Paley courtesy of Rabbi Paley

10 thoughts on “An Amazing Bill Clinton Story for our Times”

  1. Beautiful! Thank you for sharing. Both of these approaches can go together: after returning to the ever- pure state of the soul through the effortless transcending of all limitations, this brings one the strength to conquer non-life supporting habits and impulses.

  2. Great story although I don’t know if the two different ideas of the nature of human beings really affects the work to be done in everyday life. The idea of returning to one’s natural self implies that the work is easier because you are, in the end, simply returning to what you naturally do. But even this requires a lifetime of maintenance.

  3. Kook was a mystic, but not a chasidic rebbe. He had neither the inclination or the lineage for that. He was a product of the ur litvak volozhin yeshiva and considered its single greatest student. The Litvak followers of the Vilna Gaon had a mystical tradition and studied kabbalah.

  4. Fascinating story about Bill Clinton and the Rabbi…so much I learned and it also reinforced some of the things I already knew. For instance, Bill Clinton is well read, a lover of knowledge, interested in the world around him, near and far…

  5. Has Bill Clinton performed t’shuvah? It is impressive that President Clinton is acquainted with the concept and its subtle different approaches expressed by Rabbis Kook and Soloveitchik. But his expression of remorse carries greater weight in assessing his character, rather than marveling at his IQ or our sense of honor that this powerful man knows our ethical code. The good that came come from Clinton’s t’shuvah is not between the President and HaShem, but between him and the innumerable mostly men who look at Bill Clinton as a standard for their own ethical conduct. The denigration of sex to an impersonal transaction is not new in history, but it is different in the libertine irresponsibility unleashed by availability of birth control beyond the ethical judgment of society to use these technologies while retaining the elevated values that we are capable of ascribing to sex and at the polar opposite extreme the abandonment of even a minuscule element of values associated with our humanity and our capacity to create life. T’shuvah is about more than one sexual transgression, or obsessing with our iPhone email or twitter exchanges instead of conversing, or going on a binge with alcohol or drugs or food or violent entertainment. It is the relationship of action to character that qualifies an addictive pattern. The apt adage is, I think: “The chains of habit are too light to be felt until they are too heavy to be broken.” We need the kind of Presidential t’shuvah that helps to restore ethical leadership and healing such that common citizens can relate and see themselves better for it.

  6. What does the fact that Soloveitchik died in 1993 have to do with anything? Rav Kook died about 60 years before that. Clinton learned BOTH their teachings on t’shuvah.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *